Welcome, Guest

AAFES Sucks


* User

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

September 10, 2010, 01:46:47 PM

Login with username, password and session length

* Stats


  • *Total Posts: 3673
  • *Total Topics: 438
  • *Online Today: 13
  • *Most Online: 98
(August 15, 2009, 05:33:16 AM)
  • *Users: 0
  • *Guests: 12
  • *Total: 12

Author Topic: Cadmium Fashion?  (Read 756 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline TheFreud

  • Take care of the sense and the sounds will take care of themselves.
  • Administrator
  • Disgruntled Customer
  • ******
  • Posts: 404
  • Karma: 19
  • Gender: Female
    • Freud's Nuthouse
Cadmium Fashion?
« on: January 30, 2010, 03:10:47 PM »
http://www.stripes.com/article.asp?section=104&article=67470

Quote
Rebman said that after the cadmium was discovered, AAFES electronically blocked sales of the necklaces and pulled them from the shelves.
Rebman declined to detail what items were blocked, even though some had been sold. He said there is no current legal requirement to test for cadmium and that AAFES and the supplier were just being extra vigilant.
He also declined to name the supplier.
"I really don’t want to say, because there could be legal complications with that," Rebman said.

Yeah- good on you AAFES- we wouldn't want those few people who bought them to find out that what they are wearing could be dangerous, would we. Let's cover our asses instead and hope for the best. Anyone else see a problem with that?!

Offline posgirl

  • Casual Shopper
  • **
  • Posts: 50
  • Karma: 1
Re: Cadmium Fashion?
« Reply #1 on: January 31, 2010, 04:07:09 AM »
this is just another example of what all employees know,, that aafes cares more about their bottom line than their customers,,,from reading the article sounds like the big wigs in dallas would rather have dead kids than admit to any thing that might bring legal consequences

 

Powered by SMF 2.0 RC3 | SMF © 2006–2010, Simple Machines LLC
Minerva design by BlocWeb
Page created in 0.437 seconds with 26 queries.